On Thursday, plaintiff DigiMedia Tech, LLC filed a complaint in the District of Delaware against Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC for patent infringement, alleging that the defendants infringed the plaintiff’s video compression patents via smartphones with video cameras.

The patents-in-suit are United States Patent No. 6,473,532 (the ’532 patent); 6,741,250 (the ’250 patent); 6,744,818 (the ’818 patent); and 6,684,220 (the ’220 patent).

The ’532 patent, entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Visual Lossless Image Syntactic Encoding” relates to “providing a visually lossless video compression method and apparatus” via encoding, which is used “for storing video in a compressed format, where the compression does not reduce the quality of the video in a visually detectable manner.”

DigiMedia Tech alleged that the defendants “have been and are now making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing products that incorporate one or more of the inventions claimed in the ’532 patent.” DigiMedia Tech averred that the defendants infringed at least claim 6 of the ’532 patent in connection with, for example, the MotoG7 Power smartphone with video recording products.

According to the claim chart, the MotorG7 allegedly infringes at least claim 6 of the ’532 patent because it has “visual lossless encoding of frames of a video signal” as videos “shot on the Motorola G7 Power in 4K and 1080p resolution at 30fps get saved in a rather standard configuration of a 17-ish Mbps AVC video feed….” The plaintiff noted that the “(q)uality is actually good quality with plenty of detail for the class, high contrast, and lively colors.” Moreover, the “H.264 video is encoded with ‘Constant Rate Factor’ (CRF) of ~16, from bit rate of ( ) 17 M(bps) and 1080p.” The plaintiff stated that a “CFR of 16 or better is ‘visually lossless.’” Furthermore, the accused product allegedly infringed by “spatially and temporally separating and analyzing details of said frames”; specifically, the “(e)ncoding algorithms…may select between inter and intra coding for blocking shaped regions of each picture.”

DigiMedia Tech proffered that the defendants infringed by utilizing the patented claims without authorization or a license. As a result, DigiMedia Tech contended that it has been harmed and damaged by this aforementioned conduct.

The plaintiff has sought declaratory relief, an award for damages, pre and post judgment interest, and other relief. DigiMedia Tech is represented by Stamoulis & Weinblatt as well as Kent & Risley.


February 22, 2021

Lenovo, Motorola Sued for Video Compression Patent Infringement

On Thursday, plaintiff DigiMedia Tech, LLC filed a complaint in the District of Delaware against Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC for patent infringement, alleging that […]
October 23, 2020

Apple Patent Hints iPhones May Detect Head Gestures, Facial Expressions via Head-Worn Device

Apple’s new technology may be able to capture movement of anatomical features in the tissue of the head of the user via light sensors. Apple is […]
September 9, 2020

Amazon Sued for Trademark Infringement

Last Thursday, Shenzhen Qianhai Phoenix Networks Co., Ltd. (Phoenix Networks) sued Services, LLC and, Inc. (collectively Amazon) for trademark infringement of the plaintiff’s mark on its […]
July 15, 2020

Huawei Sued Over Image Processing Patents

Cedar Lane Technologies sued Huawei Technologies USA Inc. Monday in the Eastern District of Texas for patent infringement, claiming that Huawei infringed the image related patents-in-suit by its […]
July 14, 2020

JPMorgan Chase, UPS, TD Ameritrade Sued Over App Tech

Communication Interface Technologies sued JPMorgan Chase, UPS, and TD Ameritrade for patent infringement on Friday in the Eastern District of Texas, claiming that the defendants utilized patented technology for client-server […]
June 23, 2020

Dropbox Loses Patent Infringement Appeal

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision Friday from the Northern District of California, holding three patents owned by Dropbox, Inc. are ineligible under […]